Posts tagged ‘sustainability’

November 20, 2012

the grocery-bag thing

by maria polonchek

With Thanksgiving just a few days away, I figure it’s a good time for me to rant about one of my biggest pet-peeves, which, fittingly, often results in me making a fool out of myself more than it contributes to the betterment of man-kind.

It’s the grocery bags.  I don’t like grocery bags. I hate them. DESPISE them.

I’m allergic to them.

I know that, for some reason, in some circles, this is an emotional, political, tender issue that gets people feeling all defensive and angry. I’m not one of those “hippies” who thinks we ought to charge people $.03 per bag or something; I’m one of those hippies who thinks we should not have disposable grocery bags. I don’t know the statistics off-hand, (you can look them up if you want) but I figure, however much plastic is in the ocean now, or burning up energy in a recycling plant, or however many trees it takes to make paper bags, if I don’t use any of them, that’s less. That’s how I do math. Sometimes, citizens of the country in which I live get very worked up about things they think are God-given rights, dammit, like that we should get to use as many plastic shopping bags as we damn-well please, and don’t you even think of suggesting we live any other way than what we are comfortable with and used to.

Ahem.

So, anyway, I use the handy-dandy reusable bags we have collected over the years for my groceries. I haven’t even had to buy one with my own money. We’ve gotten them either as gifts, from family who has accepted our hippieness, or from the stores, who give them away because they are happy to get our money for their stuff. We have a pretty good stash at this point. One is even insulated.  But they don’t count as “reusable” if you don’t remember to reuse them and I, like lots of people, have done the thing where I forget to bring them with me and then tell the grocer, “I’m so sorry. I have bags but I left them at home/ in my car/ in the washing machine.” (If you remember this post, you know why I wash them now.) Then, despite my good intentions and a dozen cloth bags not with me, I still have to decide if I would prefer paper or plastic.

I came up with a solution to the forgetting-problem by utilizing the same sort of action/consequence conditioning I use with the kids. If I don’t remember my bags, I just don’t use bags, period. There’s nothing wrong with me having to haul everything around with my bare hands every once in a while. And, sure enough, a few times of transferring my things one-by-one from the cart into my car and then bagging it in our driveway to get it from the car to the kitchen, broke my habit of forgetting them in the first place.

But I often forget how other people, who are not used to living in the wackiness that is my head, might assimilate to this conditioning. Once, at the hardware store, the conversation went like this:

Me: “Will you please put everything back in the basket? I have reusable bags.”

Grocer: “Where are they?”

Me: “In the car.”

Grocer: “Why didn’t you go back to get them?”

Me: (Nodding toward the 3-year-old who is jumping all over the indoor display of their outdoor furniture, swinging on the plants from the Garden Center.) “It’s sort of hard to take her all over, you see?”

Grocer: “Well, then, why didn’t you remember them in the first place?”

Me: (Now the 3-year-old is tap-dancing naked on the conveyer belt while eating five candies from the shelf placed at her eye-level.) “Well, it’s kind of hard to remember everything at this point in my life.”

Grocer: “Where do you plan to put the basket when you’re done with it? You can’t just leave it in the parking lot. That’s not our policy”

Me: (Going from a bright-eyed environmentalist full of compassion to an impatient bitch who needs a Xanax and some personal space.) “I guess I’ll leave my 3-year-old in the car, in the parking lot, with a firearm and a whistle, to guard these light-bulbs and scotch tape, while I make sure that this basket arrives safely back in your hands.”

More recently, at a heath-food store, where they’re used to my kind, I did the same thing. I told them to put everything back in my cart. But I lied. I knew I didn’t have the bags in my car, becasue I took the mini-van and I keep my bags in the Prius. (How’s that for hypocritical? Nothing like ranting against waste while I have two cars to drive.)

But, this time, the grocer said, “Let me help you out with that food.”

Of course there is food in this bag from a week ago.

When we got to the van, I acted surprised: “Oh! I guess I don’t have the bags after all. It’s OK. We’ll just use my son’s backpack.”

I put my hand in and quickly threw the bag on the floor, the contents being perishables at least a week old.

“Nevermind. Let’s just use the car-seats.”

“That chicken needs to be strapped in!” the grocer said.

He was being a very good sport.

So, he helped me out and I drove away with the groceries in the carseat, like this:

Yes, that’s detox tea next to a bottle of wine. It’s all about balance.

And a few more things in the console, next to the pine-cone. Because you never know when you’re going to need an extra pine-cone.

Happy Thanksgiving…..and remember your bags!

whatever.

May 30, 2012

to bean, or not to bean

by maria polonchek

Okay. Once I tell you the name of the book I read recently, you will know where this post is going and you may very well choose to completely ignore it. The book was Eating Animals, by Jonathan Safran Foer. (Seriously, Jonathan Safran Foer. You are not a law firm. You could cut back on the nameage.) Eating Animals is his first non-fiction book after the novels Everything is Illuminated and Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close. I’ve had Everything is Illuminated on my “To Read” list for two years now, but haven’t gotten to it yet. Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close has been made into a movie and got action at the Oscars, but I don’t know what was said because I was only paying attention to Penelope Cruz and her Spanish wonderfulness.

I’m sorry. This has absolutely nothing to do with the post. I just wanted to look at her for a moment. (image: tapety24.org)

ANYWAY. As some of you early followers know, I have an ongoing interest in food. I want reiterate that I’m not interested in dieting, as in short-term eating (or not eating) with the intent to lose weight or change the way I look. This is not the relationship with food I want to model for my kids. But I am interested in diet, as in a long-term investment in nutrition, sustainability (for both me and the planet), and how food makes me feel.

Do you remember, Katie, when you gave me a hard time about going gluten-free? (Which was fine because we shared lunches, which meant YOU had to go gluten-free and, besides, I deserve a hard time about most things I try.) As I mentioned in a previous post, I’ve experimented with lots of different ways of eating, from Paleo (the “caveman” diet) to vegetarianism. And it’s true that new information on diet can morph into “fads” that come and go and often, as a result, is mis-understood. But I guess I’m open to fads because I learn new things to incorporate into a long-term way of eating, after the extremes fizzle out. For example, I’m pretty sure EVERYONE could benefit from having more veggies at breakfast.

Of course, Katie, you have had it nailed all along with your “everything in moderation” approach. But one of us needs to be fun to tease.

It seems that if a person really wants to, she can can get her hands on a lot of sound information about food. I’ve read The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Animal, Vegetable, Miracle, and Fast Food Nation. I’ve seen Food, Inc., Super Size Me, and King Corn. I cook with Food Matters and Healing With Whole Foods nearby. (Wow. That was a lot of links. I’ve still got to get to Forks Over Knives, too.)

So, while I found myself getting all worked up as I read Eating Animals, I also practiced an exercise in awareness by paying attention to the reactive chatter in my mind and not jumping to any huge conclusions. (Except for the bowl of cilantro-lime shrimp I abandoned after the chapter on seafood. Never one to waste, Chris finished it for me.) Jonathon S. F. uses personal narrative to appeal to the reader’s emotions in this book and makes some pretty huge claims that seem, at times, unreasonable.

It’s just the kind of writing that sucks me in.

In the style of mental rebuttal you had with your pastor in one of your recent posts, here is the dialogue in my head as I was reading:

  • This whole family is going vegan, like, yesterday.
  • Wait. Not sure Chris will go for that. Maybe just vegetarian.
  • Wow. “Cage-free” and “free-range” mean nothing.
  • My cousin was right. I can’t just pat myself on the back for eating “humanely raised” animals. I’ve got to question the slaughter methods. As long as the USDA has control over slaughterhouses, these animals suffer horrible deaths.
  • Well, seafood might be good for me, but it’s terrible for the environment.
  • But how are we supposed to get Omega 3s and B-vitamins?
  • Wait. Jonathon S.F. says he’s writing this because he wants to know how to feed his son. If he’s so concerned about the environment, how can he justify having any children? Our food problems aren’t getting any better by overpopulation.
  • Ohhh….I can’t go there. I have three children. And they’re pretty cool. I like to think I did the future a favor by having them.
  • It’s interesting that vegans and vegetarians don’t talk about the environmental and social impact of their diets: what about the overworked soil, pesticides, and conditions for the migrant workers who are picking all their food?
  • Dang. The only possible way for me to feel good about the way our family eats is to grow and raise our own food.
  • That’s not happening any time soon. Dang.
  • Don’t. Know. What. To. Eat.
  • Maybe we should at least get a pet chicken.

It goes on and on until I come full-circle and pretty much continue to keep doing what we’re doing. I’m planning one more vegetarian meal a week and did ask the butcher at Whole Foods where our chicken was slaughtered.  She gave me loads of information, including the name of the farm we could tour. But when I suggested this possibility  to the kids, I didn’t realize that they didn’t realize that farmers buy and raise animals specifically to kill them.  They knew we are eating animals, but they thought we ate them after they had died of old age, a distinction I take for granted.

Taj said, “I’ll visit that farm to tell the farmers they are being selfish. They’re only considering their own species.”

The twins both said they were going vegetarian, which I thought was great, until they refused to eat more vegetables. Then, they decided to eat the chicken. Kids are not so unlike adults.

I guess for now, I continue to educate myself and make the best decision with the information I have. But I wonder: how do other people approach the food conundrum? I see everything from willful ignorance to extreme activism. I seem to fall somewhere in the middle which, considering that we ALL eat, EVERY day, seems to be the least I can do.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 663 other followers