Posts tagged ‘spirituality’

November 16, 2012

my first (official) book review: whirlybirds and ordinary times

by maria polonchek

*Full Disclosure: The author of this book is a co-writer on this blog and the reviewer is her best friend. But, we’re both really good at what we do, so who cares?

My first Amazon review, despite having read many, many books and having many, many opinions:

Whirlybirds and Ordinary Times: Reflections on Faith and the Changing of Seasons, by Katie Savage

perfect for believers, non-believers, and anyone in-between

Let me begin by labeling myself as agnostic, at best, and certainly not a believer in any one religion. I do this because it seems books always need to be categorized, and, in this case, reviewers may need to be, too. For reference, some of my recent good-reads have been Spiritual Envy, Mindfulness in Plain English, and A Monk in the World.

However, I appreciate any book on pretty much any topic, as long as the author is thoughtful, interested, and has command of the classic literary techniques that make for compelling writing. Katie Savage has all of these qualities, plus a great sense of humor for good measure. She has a way, like many popular essayists from E.B. White to Anne Lamott to David Sedaris, to take everyday life, with its quirks, joys, and sorrows, and turn it into a meaningful contemplation. In the end, through her funny stories and laugh-out-loud idiosyncrasies, she’s obviously intelligent and a “deep thinker,” but never condescending or arrogant.

This book would be a great gift for, most obviously, Christians at Christmas. But it is also perfect for anyone going through transition: graduates, new parents, recent transplants to a new area, etc… While obviously written from a young-ish female perspective, the voice welcomes readers of any age or gender. The only person this may not be a fit for is someone looking for a religion-based fight or for tangible explanations to all your spiritual questions. Ms. Savage doesn’t suggest she has many, if any, answers for faith, belief, and religion. (Personally, I find this a refreshing change from books like The Case for Christ or A Purpose-Driven Life.) She instead has lots of questions and hilarious, thoughtful ways to ask them, while re-comitting herself to the faith of her childhood, now grown up.

Especially in a more inter-connected world that begs for understanding and acceptance and instead gets dogma and fundamentalism, this book is a much needed addition to discussions of faith, belief, and inner-peace.

June 1, 2012

on how i still suck at prayer beads

by katie savage

Image from oblatesosbbelmont.org

I was doing a little light reading today: Evagrius Ponticus’s The Pracktikos & Chapters on Prayer. Eew, I know. It’s research for a new book project—or at least the beginnings of ideas for a new book project. We’ll see. Anyway, Evagrius (from henceforth to be known as E-Vag in order to prevent you from growing totally bored by this post. No, wait, that sounds gross if you read it wrong. How about just E?) was a monk and wrote about it a lot. One passage in particular caught my attention:

The demon of acedia—also called the noonday demon—is the one that causes the most serious trouble of all… First of all he makes it seem that the sun barely moves, if at all, and that the day is fifty hours long. Then he constrains the monk to look constantly out the windows, to walk outside the cell, to gaze carefully at the sun to determine how far it stands from the ninth hour, to look now this way and now that to see if perhaps [one of the brethren appears from his cell]. Then too he instills in the heart of the monk a hatred for the place, a hatred for his very life itself, a hatred for manual labor. He leads him to reflect that charity has departed from among the brethren, that there is no one to give encouragement. Should there be someone at this period who happens to offend him in some way or other, this too the demon uses to contribute further to his hatred. This demon drives him along to desire other sites where he can more easily procure life’s necessities, more readily find work and make a real success of himself. He goes on to suggest that, after all, it is not the place that is the basis of pleasing the Lord. God is to be adored everywhere. He joins to these reflections the memory of his dear ones and of his former way of life. He depicts life stretching out for a long period of time, and brings before the mind’s eye the toil of the ascetic struggle and, as the saying has it, leaves no leaf unturned the induce the monk to forsake his cell and drop out of the fight. No other demon follows close upon the heels of this one (when he is defeated) but only a state of deep peace and inexpressible joy arise out of this struggle.

I started thinking that if you replaced the word “monk” with “mom,” “cell” with “house,” and “brethren” with “babies,” then this might describe my situation pretty accurately. This is probably why there are at least a few writers out there who have equated the two (like Glennon Melton and Micha Boyett, the ladies behind the blogs Momastery and Mama: Monk, respectively).

As you know, I’ve been trying to incorporate the use of prayer beads into my life. It has been going… well, it’s been going. I can’t say that I’m “good” at ye olde prayer beads quite yet. In fact, I’ve found myself internally berating myself for either not using them enough or for getting distracted so easily when I am using them. Internally berating yourself is not conducive to the upkeep of a meditative spirit, it turns out.

So the first thing I’ve been hearing from God is this: be kind to yourself. Be patient with yourself.

These two things do not come easily to me—especially when the recipient of the kindness and the patience is supposed to be me. I’ve written about this period of life, where it feels as if everything is a loose end, an elusive loose end that refuses to be tied up nicely. Things are left undone or half-assed all the time. I never used to be a half-assed person. I used to be the kid who would do the whole group project and it would include glitter and moving parts and it would get an A. Now I am the person who fudges on book deadlines, forgets to change her kid’s diaper before an outing to the grocery store, ignores her blog for an entire week, nukes a frozen pizza for dinner.

So lately, I’ve been trying to remind myself that caring for a baby is hard work. That writing a book is hard work. That having a blog is hard work. That being a friend and a daughter and a wife is hard work. That meditative prayer is hard work.

Sometimes, the reminders work and I believe myself. Sometimes not. Sometimes I wonder if the demon of acedia is getting to me.

The last time I wrote about being a stay-at-home mom in search of solitude, some of my friends who are working-moms felt left out of what I was saying. I thought a lot about whether or not I was being unfair. But perhaps I was just being incomplete.

Like you, Maria, and probably many of our readers, I’ve been both. And I think the thing that I was trying to express was a particularity of stay-at-home moming. (I hate the labels “stay at home” vs. “working” mom, too, by the way, but I can’t think of a better distinguisher. I’d love to hear suggestions in the comments section!) Being at home full-time with children is a lonely business sometimes. It’s not more or less difficult than working outside the home. It’s just different.

You wrote once about how the drive to work was a place of solitude for you. I agree—and I was lucky to have a forty-five minute commute to work. I had small breaks during the day, and though my college students demanded much of me, they never demanded that I change their diaper or carry them down the stairs. They never hung on me during a lesson or cried because I left the room.  Perhaps this is just a difference that I notice between working and staying home—solitude is difficult to find at home because, on one hand, I am lonely for lack of adult conversation, but on the other hand, I’m bombarded with never feeling alone.

At home, I have to work harder to make parts of the day feel different. To make parts of the day mine.

My major struggle right now is with acedia. If you’ve never heard the word, here’s the definition (from thefreedictionary.com):

acedia – apathy and inactivity in the practice of virtue (personified as one of the deadly sins)

Deadly? Yes. It feels like such an apt definition—practicing motherhood is a virtue. I’m not saying that when you work outside the home you stop practicing motherhood (no, no, no—not that at all). I am saying that you shelve the action part (not the internal, being part) for awhile and let someone else do that while you go about whatever task you’re paid for. (In the comments section of a post detailing the day of one stay at home mother, someone wrote something like this: “I am a working mother, so I do all of this plus work an eight-hour day.” No one called her out on this bullshit, but I will. Saying that you do both of those things is very unfair—it totally cheapens what caregivers have to do. That woman didn’t do all of those things. She couldn’t have. She certainly had a lot on her plate, but she paid someone else to do the important work of caregiving while she was at her job.) So the challenges of what a mother occupies her day with are different. When I was working outside the home, I struggled a lot with stress and restfulness. Now, I struggle with how to handle boredom and loneliness, with how to value the slower toddler’s pace at which I exist.

So the actionable, caregiving part of motherhood is a virtue that I often feel apathetic and frozen and slothful in the midst of. Some days feel exactly as E described:  “that the sun barely moves, if at all, and that the day is fifty hours long.”

I’m looking for balance in all of this, especially as my days are spent at home caring for my kids. I must learn to be patient with myself, to give myself grace sometimes. I must learn to stave off that blasted demon of acedia so “a state of deep peace and inexpressible joy arise out of this struggle.” And I must learn when to apply the grace and when to struggle against apathy.

I’m interested in hearing others’ experiences with acedia. Has it gotten to you, in whatever particular circumstances you find yourself? Does my distinction between mothers who hold an outside job and those who spend the daytime hours at home seem legitimate? Are you still thinking about how I almost called that monk E-vag?

February 17, 2012

i wouldn’t say i’ve been *missing* it, bob

by maria polonchek

Uhg. Blub, blub. These are my thoughts every time I begin to write a response to the church-thing. Really, Katie, CHURCH? Is this how everyone feels when I write about food? Not for the reasons someone might think; not because I don’t like church or the people who do. (Obviously, because I LOVE YOU and YOU LOVE CHURCH!) It’s just a difficult subject for me to discuss, given the shortfalls of our usually-sufficient English language. Sometimes there are such perfect verbs, nouns, adjectives, to describe my thoughts, experiences, struggles. (But never adverbs, because ADVERBS SUCK.)  But when it comes to such deeply personal, emotionally-charged, enigmatic topics as faith, spirituality, belief…and the baggage around them and the associations made with them–church being one of them–the language fails me. (I guess this is why you are the one who writes about faith.)

In my mind, a person can be spiritual without being religious or having faith, can be religious without belief or spirituality, can be a believer without being religious…you get the idea. Yet most people use these terms like they’re interchangeable.  And the language is tricky, too, because of the inherent implications. By that, I guess I mean taking a label and understanding what it implies by considering its opposite.  Is the opposite of a stay-at-home-mom a mother who stays away from home? If you aren’t pro-life, does that mean you’re pro-death? In a word: no. There aren’t really accurate (or prevalent, at least) words in my case for what my personal views are on the topic of faith, spirituality, belief. But they definitely aren’t just the opposite of common labels.  For example, I bristled, for reasons I don’t really understand, when I read “some people don’t claim faith at all…” It made me picture a lonely, old baggage carousel with one floppy suitcase on it labeled “faith” without anyone there to pick it up. But don’t we have to clarify, faith in what? Belief in what? Religious about what? I guess, for the sake of keeping this post blog-length, I’ll assume we’re talking about the western understanding of God and all his peeps.

So, I’ll do the best I can. Let me state what I hope is obvious: I only speak to my experience. I want to do it with compassion and understanding and I hope this is the way it’s received. Furthermore……and also……uhg. Blub, blub.

So I’ve been to a lot of church in my life, too. I grew up going to Baptist-variety churches for every Sunday morning, Sunday night, and Wednesday night service. That’s three church services a week, every week, for most of my childhood. And I loved them. I loved the music and the potlucks and my “church-clothes.” (And the Mario Brothers at the preacher’s house afterwards, while the adults drank coffee and chatted.) I went to at least two church camps every summer from the time I was 10 until I was 18. I also loved them. I loved the music and the softball and the preacher’s son, who was my first kiss, on the softball field one night past curfew. (Want to shout-out a “sorry” to my aunt, who was my chaperone that year at camp.)

As an adult, after I went to college, dropped out and became a flight attendant, quit that and went back to college, I weaved in-and-out of a bigger variety of churches. Catholic churches, Presbyterian, Episcopal, Methodist. Really hip We-Don’t-Label-Ourselves-But-We-Meet-In-A-Basement-And-Are-All-God’s-Children churches. Once, when I lived in Memphis, I was the only white person visiting a televised Pentecostal church that had a robed, hand-clapping  gospel choir and people convulsing in the aisles. A big group of them took me out to lunch afterwards at a cafeteria-style restaurant, where I promptly fainted in the macaroni-and-cheese line. When I came to, there was laying on hands and praising God for overwhelming me with his presence. I excused myself to the restroom, for a little private recovery time and realized I’d started my period. That, coupled with my recent anemia diagnosis (I was vegetarian at the time) might have been the reason for the fainting, or may be just the scientific explanation for God’s mysterious ways. We’ll never know.

Around the time I met Chris, I finally began to get honest with myself about what I do and don’t believe. You’re right, Katie–church can be such a life-giving place, when it’s done right. Acceptance, grace, goodness; all that stuff. That’s the stuff that kept me going long after I stopped believing pretty much everything the other church-goers believed in. (And the music. I sang and played guitar in the band of almost every church I’ve gone to since I left home. The music is powerful. It moves me.) But the reason for the gathering–what you call worship–doesn’t work for me as a social, public thing and leaves me feeling like, ultimately, I don’t belong and don’t want to belong.

Paradoxically, having kids is what really cemented the change of my church habits. (or lack thereof.) I say “paradoxically,” because most people return to church once they have kids–because of all the great things about it– and I’m the opposite. I don’t want to bring my children up with a religion. Yes, there are voids we feel as a family by not going to church: the sense of community, the rituals and celebrations, the casseroles at the door made by strangers, the one time a week we get to wear great clothes. (This last one may just be me.) But I don’t think these things need to have anything to do with what I consider the most personal of matters, that which I find unexplainable and always changing: what I currently refer to as “the invisible world.” My kids believe in some ridiculous things right now: Santa, The Easter Bunny, Justin Bieber.

For me, this is not the time to confuse them with religious concepts that are shaky, at best, and cruel, at worst. Because they believe in one thing right now more than any: me and what I tell them.

So, what do we do with our time? Actually, we do things that are quite nice. Our closest thing to a Sunday routine is for one of us to run out for bagels, coffee, and the New York Times  while the kids sleep in. Chris and I read and chat, the kids roll out of bed and putz around with their toys and bikes. Last Sunday, we called up our neighbors, now good friends, and went for a multi-family hike in the Santa Cruz foothills.  Sometimes I go for my long run or Chris takes his long bike-ride. It’s unusually quiet out, as Sunday morning is the only time Palo Altans take a break from being ambitious. Maybe they’re all in church.

But I wouldn’t worry too much, if I were you, that those of us who don’t go are missing out. I mean, I get why you do, just like I worry people who haven’t tried yoga, or visited Mexico, or smoked pot, are missing out. (Maybe all three at once?) Chances are, the non-church-goers know what they’re missing, and this is why they’re choosing to miss it. We are friends with many of these types and together, we make up a different kind of community. We depend on each other for the casseroles and baby-sitters and strong shoulders to lean on. At our home, instead of prayer, we go around the table before we eat and tell each other what we’re thankful for. We celebrate the equinox and solstice and the natural world. (This is not the same thing as worshiping the devil, which I’m pretty sure I was told at some point when I was a child.)  And there are always people like you, Katie, who bring the food and love and support anyway, even to people like me, who don’t go to church.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 663 other followers