Archive for ‘kids’

March 20, 2013

don’t ask me if i’m still writing.

by maria polonchek

My mom joked recently that she was going to have the phrase above printed on a shirt. (Her poignant, accessible book of poetry that explores topics from aging to war to grief can be found here.) (Have you noticed “poignant” is my new favorite word?)

Most writers (and artists and musicians and actors) who have begun or completed a major project hear this type of question often. How disappointing it is the times you have to look down at your twiddling thumbs and mutter “not really.” (Never “no.” And ALWAYS followed by an unsolicited excuse: My material was stolen. I had a baby. I was struck by West Nile Virus  My material was stolen, I had a baby, and was struck with West Nile Virus ALL AT THE SAME TIME.)

tangolikeraindrop.blogspot.com

tangolikeraindrop.blogspot.com

But, really? I’m always writing. The words flow from my gut to my heart to my brain to my twitching fingers and back to my brain again, if I can’t get them out. I’m always re-sorting experiences, organizing discussions, making sense of how sad the grocer looks, a secret the waiter must be keeping, the way the light is flooding the room.

How does it take shape? If I’m working on my novel, the words find their way in. If I’m behind on the blog, a new post sparks from the void. If I’m thinking like an essayist, lo and behold: I have another essay. When I answered the question for The Next Big Thing, “How long did it take you to write the first draft of the manuscript?” I laughed to myself and thought, my whole fucking life. When I’m asked what authors influence my work, I will say, anyone I’ve ever read. When asked what book is my favorite, I will say, the last one I finished.

I’m never not writing. So, according to poet Charles Bukowski, and others like him, I’ve found my calling. He says, on being a writer:

if it doesn’t come bursting out of you in spite of everything, don’t do it.

But still. A mother of young children finds it difficult to create. I can’t put my finger on why. Several women have tried, if you’re interested: here, here, and here.

Maybe it has to do with the myth of “balance.” When I try for balance, and one part is given more weight, the rest will tumble off the scales. Sometimes, the writing wants to consume me. Sometimes I have to let it. Sometimes, my family wants to consume me. Sometimes I have to let them. The time my familial life is most harmonious is when I’ve quieted the flood of words, whispered to the writer in me, not now. The times I’m most productive as an artist, humming along on a manuscript, I’m irritated easily by my husband and children, we eat frozen pizza for days on end, and no one can find anything in the house.

Those who offer encouragement say, “but having a child is the ultimate creative act.”

No, I don’t feel this way. A force beyond anything I could control or understand produced the art that came from the depths of my body. It was not my own.

Motherhood and creativity have a complicated relationship: not unlike that of the oil and vinegar I pour on our greens in the evening. Together, but separate. Complimentary, but will also stand on their own. A work of art when swirled, but never truly integrated.

I’ll let you decide which is the light, which is the dark. It may depend on the day.

So, yes, I’m still writing. I will always be writing.

But, for now, the pages come like slow contractions before the rush of transition: with long breaks in between.

March 14, 2013

on the bike i ain’t nobody’s mama

by maria polonchek

IMG_3657Because we sometimes forget that we agree to disagree, my husband and I periodically have a conversation when he gets home from work that sounds like this:

me: I’m so glad you’re home. The kids are driving me crazy and we need to figure something out for dinner and I’ve been working on the house all day. I’m exhausted.

him: I’ve been working all day, too, you know.

me: I didn’t say you weren’t. But I need a break from doing the same kind of work. If I don’t get a break, I’m doing the same thing, 24 hours a day.

him: I know you work hard. But when do I get a break?

me: But if you get a break when do I get a break?

Then we say we don’t know how single parents do it.

This is not earth-shattering stuff. And it’s the stuff of a relatively privileged life. If you “stay at home,” you have similar conversations. If not, you’re tired of hearing about them from those of us who do. And before you get all excited over opinions of working moms vs. “stay-at-home” moms (always in quotations until I learn of a less ridiculous term for this lifestyle), understand: this is not that kind of piece. Yes, I know the debate is alive and well lately, but here’s a secret the flame-fanners ignore: I’ve done it both ways with young children and there are benefits and disadvantages to working outside the home and working with the home. Don’t talk yourself into thinking that if you could to just go back to work or just quit your job and stay home, your life would get better.

But after having this who gets a break? conversation with friends and, ahem, spouses-who-shall-go-unnamed, I’ve been thinking: It’s not so much that I need a break from the work (that is exhausting and unpaid and culturally under-appreciated…but that is a different piece); it’s about a break from identity.

Nothing I’ve done in life has flooded me with a tidal wave of identity like becoming a mother. It was only after having my third child that I finally knew I had what it took to “stay at home.” That’s right: going back to grad school and working full-time was easier for me than staying home with twins. I had lost my already-shaky sense of identity and I didn’t know how to be a mother until I understood who I was outside of being a mother.

Back when I was teaching and writing full-time, when I met someone new, I would tell them I have three children and I teach and write. Then, we would go on to have a conversation about interesting things. Now that I tell people I have three children and I “stay at home” the conversation stalls. She must not have much to talk about, is the unspoken message I get. This reaction is not just in my head. In social settings I’ve observed friends who work outside the home quickly make it clear that they have real jobs besides “just” being a mother. I could do it too; I can say I’m a writer. But unless I’m feeling especially insecure, I don’t. I want it to be clear that “staying at home” is something I value and take pride in and yet— surprise! —I still have other things to talk about.

Cycling is one of the few pre-children identity-holdovers that I’ve kept since becoming a mother. (Even writing is something I began professionally after I had kids.) And I’ve held onto cycling not just because it fills me with passion and the energy of living. I hold onto it because it gives me that break I need from being someone’s mother. When I go through the ritual of putting on my funny little lycra pants, my jersey, my helmet, and I head out to climb the foothills and speed down the road, I am a cyclist. I am anonymous and free and I could be anyone to the stranger driving by.

I need this and my children don’t know it yet, but they need this for me. I need a break from being their mother so I can be a better mother.

What is your passion? What fills you with the goodness of life? Is it professional? Getting that certificate, going back to school,  finishing that novel? Is it creative? Photography, fashion, design? Is it physical? Dance, yoga, swimming? Is it whimsical? Reading, watching your favorite show, sitting in a sunny corner with a mug of tea?

If you haven’t the means to engage your passion, I hope you can find a way. If you choose not to engage, think twice before judging people who do. It means the world has one less resentful, bitter, unfulfilled person, which can only make it a better place.

What is your passion? Don’t let anyone make you feel guilty that it isn’t why you got a degree or it doesn’t bring in money or somehow you haven’t “earned” it.

People will judge you. Let them. And don’t fall into the trap of telling yourself you’re doing it for the kids. There’s nothing wrong with doing it for yourself.

Sometimes you’ve got to be nobody’s mama.

January 24, 2013

an open letter to my son on how i sometimes raised him like a “girl”

by katie savage

IMG_0389

Miles,

Your dad and I are pretty sure that you’ll be popular in high school. I don’t say that to brag. I just see you running through the hallways at church every Sunday with a whole gaggle of peers following you. Or overhear a youth group kid (a legitimate teenaged person who usually hates everything) say how “cool” my three-year-old is. Or notice on your teacher’s notes from preschool the ever-growing list of kids you’ve been playing with on the playground. These things, evidence of your natural, easy charm, coupled with the knowledge that you are predisposed—through genetics and, so far, interest—to become an athlete, lead us to believe that you’re not going to be an outcast if high school in your day is anything like high school in my day. As your mother, I find you pretty handsome, too, and that shouldn’t hurt.

Right now, you play with Thomas Trains and Cars Cars and with golf clubs that you’ve never used to golf with but only as swords. You have one toe that is painted hot pink, two that are red, and one that you describe as “golden.” You ask to help me cook dinner almost every night. We try to keep you away from violence (which is why you must sub-in golf clubs for weaponry), we try to keep you active (even though I am not “outdoorsy” and must force myself sometimes for your sake), we don’t make fun of you or discourage you if you ask to watch the Princess Mousie Ballerina Extravaganza of Pink Sparkles and Cupcake Dreams, or whatever that stupid show is called.

There are people who have opinions about letting little boys watch princess shows or paint their nails, but we tend to think these opinions are unfair. If your sister were to pick up a football, no one would think twice, so why should I care if you want to try on a necklace or two?

This doesn’t mean you spend half of your time with the girly stuff, though. On the contrary, you’re much more often pummeling me with pillows and jumping off the couch and making up games with balls and turning things into bombs—bombs I never taught you about. Where do you learn all of this boy-language, anyway? Is there a secret class at preschool that teaches you to “pew pew pew” with your finger-gun and fart at the table?  I don’t know—and to be honest, this is not stuff that keeps me up at night. I’m glad you have this rambunctious energy and playful competitiveness. I hope you never feel that we held you back from being as much “boy” as you want to be.

The feminist movement has done a wonderful job of helping women and girls cultivate traits that used to be considered primarily masculine: we girls are encouraged to be brave, capable, in charge, confident, sometimes even aggressive. All that’s good about what is—or perhaps sometimes what our culture has decided is—“masculine” is now not quite so reserved for those with a penis. We are better for it. (Heck, even our Disney princesses are better for it! Think of movies like Tangled, Brave, Enchanted. Those princesses don’t sit around waiting for someone to save the day—they do a significant amount of saving themselves.)

It bothers me that the opposite doesn’t seem to be true for boys. The culture doesn’t urge—at least not with the same vehemence—boys to take up feminine qualities. On the contrary, I used to sit through teacher’s education courses, in classes full of women, and wonder why there weren’t more men in the field. The same is true in fields like nursing and social work. It makes me worry about you. I want you to have a slew of options in regard to what might become your vocation. “The list of growing jobs is heavy on nurturing professions,” Hanna Rosin writes in The Atlantic, “in which women, ironically, seem to benefit from old stereotypes and habits. Theoretically, there is no reason men should not be qualified. But they have proved remarkably unable to adapt.”

Nurturing professions, she calls them. Interesting that she uses a word that usually tops the “feminine” side when we play the INNATE GENDER DIFFERENCES game.

It’s been noted that boys are having a hard time finding a “way to be” in our culture right now, and part of me believes this is because we haven’t fully let boys embrace all that’s good about what is—or perhaps sometimes what our culture decides is—“feminine.” It’s done sneakily—just like how we’d accept a little blue in a girl’s room but no pink in a boy’s room.  Or how we consistently adopt male names for female babies (Micah? Noah? Taylor? Evelyn?), but not the other way around. We celebrate a girl who learns how to lead, but I’d argue that we don’t celebrate to the same extent when a boy learns how to nurture. This, my son, is a bit of bullshit.

So while we try our best to not limit the ways you play to just those that scream “BOY,” I want to do more. I want to make sure I’m instilling in you virtues, qualities, personality traits, that will help you to “be” in the world.

Starting with two.

First, I want you to be nurturing. The word, defined, means, “to care for and protect (someone or something) while they are growing.” Even moms—the people who are expected and supposedly “wired” to be this way—sometimes feel like the ability to nurture is a quality that is underappreciated in our world; Daphne de Marneffe says it’s “treated as background noise or unspoken assumption rather than as something explicit, valuable, and important.” But I want you to know that nurturing other people is part of your responsibility—whether you ever become a father or not. In the movie Beasts of the Southern Wild, one character—the teacher—says that the most important thing she can teach her students is “that y’all learn to take care of the things that are smaller and sweeter than you.” I like that, but I’d suggest that it’s important to take care of things that are uglier and meaner than you, too. Everybody needs some taking care of sometimes, and if you can do this, you’ll be imaging God in the process.

I also want you to be hospitable. This doesn’t mean that I’d like you to take out a subscription to Martha Stewart: Living or something. I don’t have a burning passion that you become a master chef, or learn to keep house like a pro. It has nothing, really, to do with a house. Jesus, notes Barbara Brown Taylor, didn’t have a house and he was known not only for his practice of hospitality, but his insistence that his disciples learn it, too. The word comes up often in his teachings, and it is usually translated from the Greek word philoxenia. As Taylor explains, “Take the word apart and you get philo, from one of the four Greek words for love, and xenia, for stranger. Love of the stranger, in other words.” This is related to nurturing, I think, because it is another way of caring for people. It means that you should be mindful about the way your actions and your words affect the people around you. It means that you should be a careful driver, a respectful student, a courteous host, an empathetic passer-by, a concerned pillow-pummeler. Be kind even when it’s difficult, even when it’s to a person you have never met or will never meet again, even when you really, really, really want to win the game.

You are lucky, because you have a wonderful role model in your dad. On the day it first dawned on us that you would be popular in high school, his first concern was that we teach you about the responsibility that comes with being looked up to.

“We’ve got to teach him how to be the popular kid who looks out for the unpopular kids,” he said. So go crash, bang, boom with the rest of them, but try not to forget to be nurturing and hospitable in the process. Even if it is a little girly.

January 17, 2013

boys to men

by maria polonchek

photo

Here is the immediate context in a long-term process: right before Christmas, a school shooting, killing children who were the age of my twin boys, sitting diligently in their classrooms like mine do every day. My quiet tears at the simplest moments in the following weeks, self-censored, because they do not know, don’t need to know, and feel responsible for their mother’s emotional health. Next, a letter to Santa, written in 7-year-old, erratic hand, “nerf gun and bullets” at the top of the list.  Then, a New York Times piece, hypothesizing, with some flaws, that as we usher in “The End of Men,” we will see an increase in white, young, male-inflicted violence as those creatures, previously at the top of the chain, bluster around without a way to be.

Finally, the Eureka! moment at the ice-skating rink: skating slowly and steadily with my toddler girl, around the outside of the rink as she balances on the tiniest skates I’ve ever laced. In the center, elementary girls practice spinning and leaping on the ice. Between us, mother after mother (I counted three) losing her temper as her young boy barrels full speed and slams into her, all smiles with new grown-up teeth too big for his mouth.

“Seriously?!?!” one mom says, holding onto the boy’s younger sibling.

“You’ve got to be kidding me!” another exclaims.

“What’s wrong with you? What are you thinking?” says the latest.

The boys, their grins wiped clean, look down, shrug. “Sorry,” they mumble, if they say anything at all.

*

About the time my own boys’ love affair with Thomas Trains was waning, a friend came over with her toddler. I was hoping to entertain him: “We have lots of great toys for boys!” I said.

My friend corrected me: “You mean you have lots of great toys for kids.”

My cheeks burned and I stuttered, as her son crashed the trains into one another with delight. Right. Obviously. Of course I meant “kids.”  I have a graduate degree in humanities from a liberal university. I am a feminist. I am progressive.

But, no. I meant “boys.” The only train my daughter has shown interest in is “Rosie,” who’s purple, and even then was abandoned because she just has so many…wheels.

In our push to see women as equals, do we sometimes mistake “equal” for meaning “the same,” to the advantage of our daughters and with contempt for our sons?  Some girls are more masculine. Some boys are more feminine. I get this. I love this.

I may love it too much. Because when my daughter wants to break out of “girl” and play stormtroopers or construction workers with her brothers, I cheer. When her brothers want to break out of “boy” and tap dance or paint their nails, I cheer. But when my boys just—heaven forbid—want be boys and slam, tackle, bang, boom….I don’t often cheer. I’m quiet. Sometimes, like the mothers at the ice-rink, I admonish.

And they are left feeling misunderstood and confused and left without a way to be.

*

I remember reading about the high rate of domestic abuse cases among college and professional athletes. It’s despicable, disgusting, unacceptable, we all say. But I had uncles, brothers, boyfriends, who were athletes. Don’t we encourage them to be aggressive, tough, intimidating, on the court or the field? Don’t we cheer for them and pay millions of dollars to see them let loose with their testosterone-fueled, masculine tendencies? And then we shame them for indulging those traits when the arena is dark and the stadium is empty?

Do they need an outlet? Or a lesson in repression? Don’t we need to choose?

I’m speaking to a certain demographic, I know. Not everyone will identify. Some will judge. But others will relate and, I hope, share their own confusion and inconsistencies and we will find a way to let our boys be the many, sometimes predictable and stereotypical, ways to be.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 663 other followers